| [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263683] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 16:02 |
|
This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
they please post a followup to this message.
Thanks,
Adrian.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263685 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 16:12 |
|
In article <e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl>, 8'FED generously decided to
share with us..
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
OK..
Gid
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263689 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 16:31 |
|
8'FED wrote:
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
ÞeSe RUneS aRe STRaNge...
goT To go, ÞeY iUST calleD MY fligHT HeRe aT HeaÞRoW
THoR
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263690 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 16:36 |
|
Also Sprach Gid Holyoake:
> In article <e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl>, 8'FED generously
> decided to share with us..
>
>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this
>> newsgroup could they please post a followup to this
>> message.
>
> OK..
>
> Gid
*Gods*. With an "o"...
--
Dave
Official Absentee of EU Skiffeysoc
http://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/societies/sesoc
"What do monsters have nightmares about?"
"Me!"
-The Doctor
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263691 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 16:37 |
|
Gid Holyoake <abuse [at] brynamman.org.uk> writes:
> In article <e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl>, 8'FED generously decided to
> share with us..
>
>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>> they please post a followup to this message.
>
> OK..
>
> Gid
Gods, not Gids. It's an easy mistake.
--
ilmari
"A disappointingly low fraction of the human race is,
at any given time, on fire." - Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263714 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 18:12 |
|
On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
>
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
Peter
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263725 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 18:37 |
|
8'FED wrote:
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrian.
>
>
Well I was going to but then the Big Bang happened, then that bloody
evolution stuff
--
The Apostate
CTID
Keep The Faith
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263747 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 20:33 |
|
in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au wrote on
08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
That would be all of us then.
--
Lesley Weston.
Brightly_coloured_blob is real, but I don't often check even the few bits
that get through Yahoo's filters. To reach me, use leswes att shaw dott ca,
changing spelling and spacing as required.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263750 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 20:37 |
|
Lesley Weston wrote:
> in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au
> wrote on 08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>
>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup
>> could they please post a followup to this message.
>
> That would be all of us then.
Thou art god.
Anyone for broth?
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263759 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 20:55 |
|
On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:37:15 GMT, Stacie Hanes <house_damodred [at] yahoo.co=
m> =
wrote:
>
> Thou art god.
>
> Anyone for broth?
>
Grokking is.
-- =
Insert clever/witty/deep sig here
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263761 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 20:56 |
|
RuneMaster wrote:
> On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:37:15 GMT, Stacie Hanes
> <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thou art god.
>>
>> Anyone for broth?
>>
>
> Grokking is.
Iäm just waiting for Stacie to tell us she's got a snake.
Orjan
--
The Tale of Westala and Villtin
http://tale.cunobaros.com/
Fiction, Thoughts and Software
http://www.cunobaros.com/
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263765 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 21:06 |
|
Orjan Westin wrote:
> RuneMaster wrote:
>> On Mon, 08 May 2006 18:37:15 GMT, Stacie Hanes
>> <house_damodred [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thou art god.
>>>
>>> Anyone for broth?
>>>
>>
>> Grokking is.
>
> Iäm just waiting for Stacie to tell us she's got a snake.
>
I used to, but not anymore.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263769 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 21:14 |
|
8'FED wrote:
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
>
> Thanks,
You're most welcome, Adrian.
This is the God within Rocky Frisco. using him (with his permission) to
answer your survey. Any other questions?
-The God within Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263771 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 21:15 |
|
Gid Holyoake wrote:
> In article <e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl>, 8'FED generously decided to
> share with us..
>
>
>>This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>they please post a followup to this message.
>
>
> OK..
>
> Gid
God Holyoake? Slips nicely off the old tongue, it does.
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263806 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 22:11 |
|
Peter Ellis wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
>
>>
>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>> they please post a followup to this message.
>
>
> Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
Well, I'm so glad we finally got that straightened out.
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263816 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 22:28 |
|
Lesley Weston wrote:
> in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au wrote on
> 08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>
>
>>This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>they please post a followup to this message.
>
>
> That would be all of us then.
Indeed.
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263834 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 22:58 |
|
Rocky Frisco wrote:
> Lesley Weston wrote:
>
>> in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au
>> wrote on
>> 08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>>
>>
>>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>> they please post a followup to this message.
>>
>>
>>
>> That would be all of us then.
>
>
> Indeed.
>
> -Rocky
ROFL - look Rocky, you converted an entire newsgroup in a matter of
days!!
That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263842 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 23:21 |
|
peachy ashie passion wrote:
> Rocky Frisco wrote:
>
>> Lesley Weston wrote:
>>
>>> in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au
>>> wrote on
>>> 08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>>>
>>>
>>>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup
>>>> could they please post a followup to this message.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> That would be all of us then.
>>
>>
>> Indeed.
>>
>> -Rocky
>
> ROFL - look Rocky, you converted an entire newsgroup in a matter
> of days!!
>
> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
Wrong thread, peach.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263850 ] |
Mo, 08 Mai 2006 23:14 |
|
Rocky Frisco rocknatural [at] gmail.com wrote in
<QBN7g.52631$_z2.45226 [at] dukeread02>:
> Peter Ellis wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> >> they please post a followup to this message.
> >
> >
> > Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
>
>
> Well, I'm so glad we finally got that straightened out.
>
Speak for ourselves. We're still very confused.
--
eric
www.ericjarvis.co.uk
"all characters portrayed in this post are entirely
fictitious and should not be confused"
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263855 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 00:13 |
|
Peter Ellis <pjie2 [at] cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
> >
> > This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> > they please post a followup to this message.
>
> Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
I'm not! I'm Brian...
Richard
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263858 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 00:33 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>>Rocky Frisco wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lesley Weston wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au
>>>>wrote on
>>>>08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup
>>>>>could they please post a followup to this message.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That would be all of us then.
>>>
>>>
>>>Indeed.
>>>
>>>-Rocky
>>
>> ROFL - look Rocky, you converted an entire newsgroup in a matter
>>of days!!
>>
>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
>
>
>
> Wrong thread, peach.
It's never the wrong thread for a silver tongued devil!
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263859 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 00:55 |
|
In a speech called 445fc131.18052296 [at] news.xs4all.nl,
Richard Bos uttered thus:
> Peter Ellis <pjie2 [at] cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup
> > > could they please post a followup to this message.
> >
> > Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
>
> I'm not! I'm Brian...
>
> Richard
I've just killed this thread
--
http://freespace.virgin.net/b.wakeling/index.html
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sabremeister/
Use b dot wakeling at virgin dot net to reply
"It's not enough to be Hungarian, you must have talent too."
- Alexander Korda
|
|
|
| Re: Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263873 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 02:57 |
|
8'FED wrote:
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
I AM THE GOD OF HELL FIRE, AND I BRING YOU your lawnmower back, thanks
ever so much.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263892 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 05:28 |
|
peachy ashie passion wrote:
> Rocky Frisco wrote:
>
>> Lesley Weston wrote:
>>
>>> in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au
>>> wrote on
>>> 08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>>>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>>> they please post a followup to this message.
>>> That would be all of us then.
>> Indeed.
>>
>> -Rocky
>
>
> ROFL - look Rocky, you converted an entire newsgroup in a matter of
> days!!
Actually, I've been at it since 1993; it just started to work since I
quit cussing. ;)
> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
ARrrrrrrrgh! You're doing it on purpose, aren't you!
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263894 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 05:37 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>>Rocky Frisco wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Lesley Weston wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au
>>>>wrote on
>>>>08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup
>>>>>could they please post a followup to this message.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>That would be all of us then.
>>>
>>>
>>>Indeed.
>>>
>>>-Rocky
>>
>> ROFL - look Rocky, you converted an entire newsgroup in a matter
>>of days!!
>>
>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
> Wrong thread, peach.
I'm going to start having fantasies about the two of you if you don't
watch out!
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263901 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 05:44 |
|
Eric Jarvis wrote:
> Rocky Frisco rocknatural [at] gmail.com wrote in
> <QBN7g.52631$_z2.45226 [at] dukeread02>:
>
>>Peter Ellis wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>>>they please post a followup to this message.
>>>
>>>
>>>Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
>>
>>
>>Well, I'm so glad we finally got that straightened out.
>>
>
>
> Speak for ourselves. We're still very confused.
"As above, so below."
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263904 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 05:47 |
|
Richard Bos wrote:
> Peter Ellis <pjie2 [at] cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
>>
>>>This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>>they please post a followup to this message.
>>
>>Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
>
>
> I'm not! I'm Brian...
That gets the prize for this week!
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263905 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 05:47 |
|
The Apostate wrote:
> 8'FED wrote:
>
>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>> they please post a followup to this message.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Adrian.
>>
>>
> Well I was going to but then the Big Bang happened, then that bloody
> evolution stuff
>
I just searched my hard drive for a copy of the cartoon where God is
admiring earth and he turns to one of the angels and says: "Intelligent
design is fine, the problem is intelligent maintenance."
|
|
|
| Re: Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263907 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 05:58 |
|
Robert Carnegie wrote:
> 8'FED wrote:
>
>>This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>they please post a followup to this message.
>
>
> I AM THE GOD OF HELL FIRE, AND I BRING YOU your lawnmower back, thanks
> ever so much.
You are Arthur Brown and I claim my 5 quid.
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263911 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 06:14 |
|
Blake wrote:
> The Apostate wrote:
>
>> 8'FED wrote:
>>
>>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>> they please post a followup to this message.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Adrian.
>>>
>>>
>> Well I was going to but then the Big Bang happened, then that bloody
>> evolution stuff
>>
> I just searched my hard drive for a copy of the cartoon where God is
> admiring earth and he turns to one of the angels and says: "Intelligent
> design is fine, the problem is intelligent maintenance."
As a Gloamingerite I must say: the problem is the designer trying out
His own product and getting lost in it, resulting in no maintenace at all.
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263912 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 06:16 |
|
Rocky Frisco wrote:
> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>> Rocky Frisco wrote:
>>
>>> Lesley Weston wrote:
>>>
>>>> in article e3nj1h$foa$1 [at] mud.stack.nl, 8'FED at dragon [at] netyp.com.au
>>>> wrote on
>>>> 08/05/2006 7:02 AM:
>
>
>>>>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>>>> they please post a followup to this message.
>
>
>>>> That would be all of us then.
>
>
>>> Indeed.
>>>
>>> -Rocky
>>
>>
>>
>> ROFL - look Rocky, you converted an entire newsgroup in a matter of
>> days!!
>
>
> Actually, I've been at it since 1993; it just started to work since I
> quit cussing. ;)
>
>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
>
>
> ARrrrrrrrgh! You're doing it on purpose, aren't you!
>
> -Rocky
*grinblush* Actually, um.
Yeah.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263917 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 06:52 |
|
>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
>> ARrrrrrrrgh! You're doing it on purpose, aren't you!
>>
>> -Rocky
> *grinblush* Actually, um.
>
> Yeah.
(Thinks) "It has to be a plot. I am out of my league here. This lady is
going to soften me up and then squash me like a hedgehog run over by a
cement lorry."
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Rocky was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263919 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 06:57 |
|
Rocky Frisco wrote:
>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>
>>>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
>
>
>>> ARrrrrrrrgh! You're doing it on purpose, aren't you!
>>>
>>> -Rocky
>
>
>
>> *grinblush* Actually, um.
>>
>> Yeah.
>
>
> (Thinks) "It has to be a plot. I am out of my league here. This lady is
> going to soften me up and then squash me like a hedgehog run over by a
> cement lorry."
>
> -Rocky
I'm really quite nice. Honest.
I tend to ask a lot of questions, which can come off as
argumentative, prompting more than one person to suggest busting out a
gag of some sort or another. But honestly, I'm just trying to
understand. I have this insatiable curiosity thing going.
I just can't help it!
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263920 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 06:57 |
|
Rocky Frisco wrote:
>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>
>>>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
>
>>> ARrrrrrrrgh! You're doing it on purpose, aren't you!
>>>
>>> -Rocky
>
>
>> *grinblush* Actually, um.
>>
>> Yeah.
>
> (Thinks) "It has to be a plot. I am out of my league here. This
> lady is going to soften me up and then squash me like a hedgehog
> run over by a cement lorry."
She's like that.
--
Stacie, 4th swordswoman of the afpocalypse.
AFPMinister of Flexible Weapons, Bondage-happy predator,
Speaker-To-Students, AFPMistress to peachy ashie passion &
AFPDeliciousSnack to 8'FED "If you can't be a good example, you'll
just have to be a horrible warning." C. Aird, _His Burial Too_
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263924 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 07:07 |
|
peachy ashie passion wrote:
> Rocky Frisco wrote:
>
>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
>>
>>
>>
>>>> ARrrrrrrrgh! You're doing it on purpose, aren't you!
>>>>
>>>> -Rocky
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> *grinblush* Actually, um.
>>>
>>> Yeah.
>>
>>
>>
>> (Thinks) "It has to be a plot. I am out of my league here. This lady
>> is going to soften me up and then squash me like a hedgehog run over
>> by a cement lorry."
>>
>> -Rocky
>
>
>
> I'm really quite nice. Honest.
>
> I tend to ask a lot of questions, which can come off as argumentative,
> prompting more than one person to suggest busting out a gag of some sort
> or another. But honestly, I'm just trying to understand. I have this
> insatiable curiosity thing going.
>
> I just can't help it!
Can't imagine why we hit it off so badly a while back. Probably my
fault. See how much I have changed since becoming a Presbyterian?
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263925 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 07:08 |
|
Stacie Hanes wrote:
> Rocky Frisco wrote:
>
>>>>peachy ashie passion wrote:
>>
>>>>> That's a seriously fast tongue you've got there!
>>
>>>>ARrrrrrrrgh! You're doing it on purpose, aren't you!
>>>>
>>>>-Rocky
>>
>>
>>> *grinblush* Actually, um.
>>>
>>> Yeah.
>>
>>(Thinks) "It has to be a plot. I am out of my league here. This
>>lady is going to soften me up and then squash me like a hedgehog
>>run over by a cement lorry."
>
>
> She's like that.
Takes one to know one, I suspect.
Always was attracted to dangerous women.
-Rocky
--
O'Toole's Corollary: Murphy was an optimist.
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263930 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 07:34 |
|
8'FED wrote:
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrian.
There's some guy here who wants to make clear he isn't a god, he's just
a carpenter, and all those rumours about his mother having an affair
behind his father's back are just lies, and could someone please get
those nails off from his wrists...
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263948 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 10:54 |
|
On 8 May, Richard Bos wrote:
> Peter Ellis <pjie2 [at] cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 8 May 2006, 8'FED wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
>>> they please post a followup to this message.
>>
>> Posting on behalf of Rocky, because I *am* Rocky, as are we all.
>
> I'm not! I'm Brian...
>
> Richard
I'm Brian. I have the .sig to prove it...
--
Brian Howlett - Email to From: address deleted unseen
-----------------------------------------------------
Engaging "getting the hell out of here" mode...
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263949 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 10:59 |
|
8'FED wrote:
> This is a survey. If there are any gods reading this newsgroup could
> they please post a followup to this message.
I)In the beginning there were hedgehogs
II)And they were much afraid of being buggered
III)Lo, did the hedgehogs cry out to their brothers the ferrets for advice
IV)But it was not their birthday
V)The gods of afp did look upon the hedgehogs with mercy
VI)And taking up their Wit, which was as sharp as a thousand scimitars, did
break it into a thousand pieces
VII)And these pieces they fixed on the backs of the hedgehogs as spines, to
protect them from all manner of buggery forever more
VIII)Thus, the unbuggerability of Hedgehogs is remembered in song to this
day
IX)Much rejoicing and chocolate was had by all.
X)And lo, Stacie, goddess of vampire slayers, did cry out to the heavans.
XI)"Who has placed an eight legged fiend in my shower?"
XII)"Seriously, I'm not kidding. Own up."
XIII)The other gods quaked with fear at this rage
XIV)And there was a gnashing of te-"What are you writing, Puck?"
XV)And there was a gnashi-"You are writing about spiders again, aren't you?"
XVI)And there-"Did YOU put a spider in my shower?"
XVII)Puck, god of getting on everyone elses nerves, denied this charge
vehemently
XVIII)But Stacie threatened him with cruel tortures.
XIX)And at last he confessed that, okay, maybe he did have something to do
with an individual of the arachnoid pursuasion, and an ablutionary device of
the showery type, and the coming into conjunction of said items. Maybe.
XX)And he was heard from nae more.
XXI)"How did he know where my shower is, anyway?"
XXII)"That's creepy."
XXIII)"And how do I turn of these roman numeral things?"
XXIV)"Turn off!"
XXV)"I mean it!"
XXVI)"Help!"
--
Puck (onstage): I am that merry wanderer of the night!
Peaseblossom (in audience): "I am that merry wanderer of the night",
indeed! "I am that
giggling-dangerous-totally-bloody-psychotic-menace-to-life and limb,
more like." -Neil Gaiman
|
|
|
| Re: [I] Testing for the Existence of God(s) [message #263951 ] |
Di, 09 Mai 2006 11:15 |
|
Puck:
>
> XXIII)"And how do I turn of these roman numeral things?"
> XXIV)"Turn off!"
> XXV)"I mean it!"
> XXVI)"Help!"
Damn Word.
--
\\\\ Jens Ayton, Fratello di Vetinari 36.3636363636364% insane
\\\\\__, Bringing sarcastic one-liners to the common hedgehog since 1999
\\\\\`/
|
|
|
